Divide and Rule.

History repeats itself, we’ve heard that before. One of the greatest teachers probably is history. What matters is what lessons we take from it. The recent controversy of reservations in higher educational institutions has kicked up a minor storm of its own. What is discouraging is that no politician worth his salt (I mean that sarcastically - salt comes pretty cheap these days! It is an easily purchasable commodity) is opposing the move for fear of loosing out on a large vote-bank. What is encouraging is that students – those who are directly affected by these decisions – are taking to the streets themselves, a bold and proactive act. There have been views from both sides of the fence. There are two things that I would like to point out, items that seem pertinent to me.
1) The media will play along as long as it is a saleable story… the moment there is a bigger happening these protests will be relegated to the inner pages (print) and to smaller time slots (T.V) to finally die a quiet death – of the lonely kind which will fail to make it to the obituary column of the very same daily that once screamed itself hoarse in its colorful headlines. Let us not depend on the fourth estate, lets engage them for our benefit…
2) Those opposing reservations have their points. Those wanting reservations have theirs. There is vast majority of us who have our reservations against these reservations! What is required is a consensus… a national debate… at a grass roots level. Though we have a robust democracy and elected representatives in parliament, we forget that we are being shortchanged by these rogues (many of them literally are goons!) who are less of legislators and more of seasoned professional politicians. Politicians who dabble in the “business” of politics – not the welfare of the people they represent, not the service of the nation they are born in, not to govern. Some doddering senile old oaf thinks of a hare-brained scheme to garner votes and stay on in power without any long term goal or vision for the advancement of anyone!

Why should we allow legislation, no matter how sacrosanct its legality may seem as one passed by our apex legislative body if it is myopic and politically motivated? Their story is that they want the under privileged section of society to be a part of the mainstream. What were they doing for the last 60 years? How effective have their earlier schemes been? Is the benefit being taken by a majority of those it is intended for… or abused by the select few… corruption is abysmal here and a false certificate easy to obtain… who is going to ensure the veracity of such claims?
The weakest link in their argument and poor foundation (according to me) lies in the fact that they are hoping to bring about a ‘social’ change in a population – maybe close to half a billion of my countrymen! So sizable it benumbs the mind – by a few seats in the super specialized courses… can you even begin to imagine the skewed ratio? So if there is some Smart Alec who asks “you think YOU know better?” I answer “No, nor am I claiming to … but I do have a suggestion… rather that waste thousands after a few who don’t actually deserve it; if we consider the meritocracy view-point, higher education does cost a bomb… why not devote that same monies and allocate them for better, stronger and more efficient primary level schools instead? You want a level playing field? Let us ALL have the damn same level to play along from day one… give each child access to similar levels of educational exposure and ensure a decent, if not stringently high, standard so that there is no discrepancy when they sit for competitive exams. That is precisely where the politicians have failed the people of my nation – which has lead to the current discontent – which they are trying to assuage by this flimsy band aid – which will not improve their lot in reality – ensuring that at the end of the day the country suffers in an increasingly competitive world. The guiding principle ought to be based on merit alone!

Am I against the whole idea of reservations? Yes. I think it demeans the ones it is purported to benefit while disillusioning scores of other able youth. Am I against the principle and ideal of the thing? No. As a schoolboy I have recited our pledge too often, I feel for those less fortunate of my brethren. It shall remain our collective responsibility to set right historical wrongs. They were unfortunate by birth then, now they are only unfortunate by circumstance… We shall rise together…

It is an old military tactic to divide and rule. I am sure Lao Tzu has something to say to that effect in his Art of War, we suffered British rule for the same reason, to this day the seeds of conflict amongst Hindus & Muslims reap their bloody harvest. Politicians reap the benefits on religion and caste based lines at the polls, and now they further are weakening our national fabric by creating dissension amongst the youth – any country depends on the vigor and dreams of its youth to propel it to a prosperous future…the story we heard as children is simple, yet holds an important message “united we stand, divided we fall”. Fellow Indians… and “humpty-dumpty”s lets stick together and show these scum of a political class what stuff WE – the FUTURE of this great land - are made of… …

Comments

Sana said…
This is a brilliant post, Darshan! You know i have strong opinions regarding this issue (and almost every other), but unlike my first reaction of "Reservations are bad and cannot be tolerated", i'm beginning to see the grey areas. The more i read about this, the more complicated it gets. One cannot deny the ill-treatment of the Dalits and other (less publicized) backward classes. One cannot ignore the inherent caste system in our cultural fabric that is most certainly deletorious to a great number of factions in our society. One cannot, also, compare the merits of a child who has studied with access to a computer, internet, innumerable books and brilliant schools to those of a child who studied in the local pathshala with non-existent teachers, under the lamp-post. Two months ago, i would've been terribly enthusiastic about going to an anti-reservation march, and while i dont think the reservations are the way to go even now, it pains me to see the medical fraternity polarised as it is. Instead of integrating the backward classes into the mainstream, all that's happening to them here is further marginalisation. The media seems to be lionizing the 'open category' while demonizing the 'reserved category'. Ofcourse, lathi charges by the police havent helped either (which, by the way, is so medieval). Furthermore, the IMA taking such an polar stand on this issue is not at all called for. If there was a single platform on which this issue could have been debated within the medical fraternity, it was the IMA. But for them to take a stand and support one part of the fraternity against another has put the nail in the coffin. We are now beyond reconciliation.
Also, i saw something on NDTV about medical students standing at traffic signals and handing out fliers to people, explaining to them why the reservations are a bad idea because they will result in 'bad doctors'. While i think that's a great way to gather public support and sympathy, i believe its tantamount to lying. This is not about the patients. It it has nothing to do with the welfare of the people. It has everything to do with furthering the career opportunities of a select, privelaged few. THAT needs to be clear to the people. We've seen enough to know that the reserved category students dont necessarily make bad doctors, just as the open category ones dont essentially make good ones. There definitely is an element of merit to how well one does in medical school (and later in the medical profession), but what has more to do with making good doctors is a sound medical education. If we really WERE concerned about the quality of doctors we're churning out, we'd be going out into the streets, protesting against private medical institutions with bad infrastructure and no patients. So why were we never proactive about these reservations for the rich which came in the form of 'management quota' or 'donation seats'? The bottom line is, that this is not about fear of malpractice in the medical profession, and the lay person needs to know that.
On the other hand, what's encouraging about this whole scenario is that people are beginning to sit up and take notice of how politics affects them. Even if they arent 'socially conscious', atleast they're becoming politically conscious. Maybe now, students will go out and vote in larger numbers to as to become the lucrative vote bank. Maybe there will come a time when bills are passed to garner their appericiation (which will eventually translate into votes). But then again, your vision of working from the grass roots might just fall short. Because children can't vote. So who wants to work for THEIR well-being, right? It really is a dismal situation, and despite being the optimist that i am, i dont see it improving anytime soon, unless we see some sort of unprecedented unification of the medical fraternity, which, at this time, seems utopian.
Sana said…
Ok, that was an epic comment. I guess i kinda got carried away. Anyway, i'm posting this on the nair dental yahoo group with a link to your site. I think more people need to read it. I hope you dont mind.
-Sana
- said…
We have a series started on this topic. If interested you can read it here.

http://nohattip.blogspot.com

Popular Posts